Comments on: JavaScript Obfuscator and Minifier http://www.timwhitlock.info/blog/2008/06/14/javascript-obfuscator-and-minifier/ Tim Whitlock's personal site and blog Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:41:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Richard van Velzen http://www.timwhitlock.info/blog/2008/06/14/javascript-obfuscator-and-minifier/#comment-29 Richard van Velzen Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:28:46 +0000 http://web.2point1.com/2008/06/14/javascript-obfuscator-and-minifier/#comment-29 There's a little problem with minification when using the with statement. I think any minifier has the same problem, because static analysis is impossible within a with. You never know if the "variable" you're looking at is actually a property of the given object or just a variable. Behold: <code>function min() {} with(Math) { min(); }</code> There’s a little problem with minification when using the with statement. I think any minifier has the same problem, because static analysis is impossible within a with. You never know if the “variable” you’re looking at is actually a property of the given object or just a variable. Behold:

function min() {}
with(Math) {
min();
}

]]> By: Laurentiu http://www.timwhitlock.info/blog/2008/06/14/javascript-obfuscator-and-minifier/#comment-28 Laurentiu Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:50:08 +0000 http://web.2point1.com/2008/06/14/javascript-obfuscator-and-minifier/#comment-28 I have gave it a try but seems to crash on 4 of 5 of my tests. YUI Compressor works on all of them - so I will go with that for now I have gave it a try but seems to crash on 4 of 5 of my tests.
YUI Compressor works on all of them – so I will go with that for now

]]>